Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, one of main destination for individuals who are fond of art-related events has been museum. In some countries lots of them ask for particular amount of money as their admission. Although it has obtained several benefits for society, I myself believe it has more drawbacks which outweigh the positive aspects.
To commence with, on the one side, this issue has gained several benefits for art portion. By implementing expensive admission for entering art exhibitions, lots of money would add to art industry. This has propelled that portion to have more opportunities to hold many upcoming events with saving the considerable amount of money. Resulting of the mentioned act, producing and preparing more and more of those museums and other kinds of art productions would occur. For example, one museum in England that named ‘public attraction’ has had certain charge for almost 2 decades which has led them to not only heighten their quality, but also entice lots of tourists from all around the world to have an intense passion to visit it.
On the other hand, charging people especially local ones to pay amount of money in order to allow them to enter museums, may have several adverse impacts on them. This action could perform like a deterrent for interested people not to come to these mentioned places. It is true, this issue may not be considered by foreign visitors who have come for their holiday in the country and do not care about the price. On the opposite, it may have negative effects on native people’s enthusiasm for visiting these places. For example, although an Iranian citizen have wanted to go to art exhibitions, if they do not have enough payment, they will pass up just because of its high charge. As a result, the number of their visitors may decline for that.
In conclusion, with considering all the possible aspects of this issue, as like some other individuals, I believe its effects have been more negative than positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98187311178 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63762661143 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1387549923 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236063229216 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793882824029 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325109551617 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131200880907 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647659320364 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.