Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
The unique social and cultural values of a country play a vital role in emphasizing its identity. Therefore, people all over the world have been making endless efforts to preserve such precious heritage since ancient times, and museums are the most popular way to fulfill this purpose. Many museums, therefore, require people to pay a small fee when paying a visit, but some are free. This essay will outline several pros and cons of such charging fees and point out why the advantages would obviously outweigh the downsides.
To begin with, charging people for admission is quite reasonable, and will also bring some plus points. When visitors have to pay a certain amount of money for their trip, they may view it as a valuable experience and appreciate the items they get to observe. Moreover, the process of preserving and maintaining those exhibits could be quite costly and challenging, so charging for admission would somehow contribute to helping keep those artifacts in their original status. For example, money collected from visitors could be spent on specialized chemicals to slow down the process of degrading or hiring professional experts over the world to study more about their unique values. Consequently, a small fee would be necessary as, on a bigger scale, it can help to preserve those valuable pieces of evidence and provide future generations with more diverse viewpoints of history.
On the other hand, there are many people who hold the belief that charging a small fee does not bring such benefits. As other forms of entertainment such as social media have incredibly risen in popularity, they suggest that museums should be freely available for the public to promote more participation. With increasing competition with other means of recreation, if charging fees are still present, there will be fewer and fewer people who decide to visit museums but rather learn about them online for example. Consequently, this may be disadvantageous and could lead to the closure of many museums.
To sum up, despite some inevitable drawbacks, I believe the advantages of charging fees are still superior on the grounds that people need to understand more about the past and even the present context they are in now. Such values could be found nowhere except for museums, where many crucial pieces of evidence are kept.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, except for, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10677083333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65204809604 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4408459418 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283343537616 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906406519872 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594540926985 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163321968335 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476073432038 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.