Museums charge for admission is debatable. Some people think that the admission fee of any museums is not ideal while others believe there are more benefits of free entry in the museums. This essay will discuss why the advantages of the entry fee in the museum do in fact outweigh the disadvantages.
If museums charge for entry, it will affect economic growth for travel in nations and collecting the funds for ancient things, history and arts. Moreover, the importance of tourism for the museum will increase. For example, there are plenty of museums in India and they are not freely available for entry, so they are financially stable. As a result, they can improve the facilities for the traveller who are visiting. However, the economic sustainability of tourism will also rise. In short, because of the funds and economic growth, it is crucial to charge for entry into museums.
Although there are lots of advantages of paid entry in museums, it will decrease the number of visitors and affect the value of museums in a negative way. Moreover, anyone cannot go to the museum. For instance, there are lots of students who are showing interest in ancient things, history and arts but they do not have enough money to enter into museums. In addition, the identity of museums will get obsolete. Overall, the identity of the museums and history might decline in the future that is why it is important for the museum to do not charge for admission for students in museums.
It is increasingly likely that charging entry fee in the museum has several benefits. However, there has been required to increase provisions for visitors. Ultimately, there are lots of prons of entry fee and which leads to positive aspects for museums in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...isitors and affect the value of museums in a negative way. Moreover, anyone cannot go to the muse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89562289562 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54704847393 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457912457912 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7651201305 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5294117647 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471013886235 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169406769859 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131068445625 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313965380675 0.151304729494 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108328801701 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.