Museums charge for admission is debatable. Some people think that the admission fee of any museums is not ideal while others believe there are more benefits of free entry in the museums. This essay will discuss why the advantages of the entry fee in the museum do in fact outweigh the disadvantages.
If museums charge for entry, it will affect economic growth for travel in nations and collecting the funds for ancient things, history and arts. Moreover, the importance of tourism for the museum will increase. For example, there are plenty of museums in India and they are not freely available for entry, so they are financially stable. As a result, they can improve the facilities for the traveller who are visiting. However, the economic sustainability of tourism will also rise. In short, because of the funds and economic growth, it is crucial to charge for entry into museums.
Although there are lots of advantages of paid entry in museums, it will decrease the number of visitors. Moreover, anyone cannot go to the museum. For instance, there are lots of students who are showing interest in artefacts, historical research and artistic but they do not have enough money to enter into museums. In addition, the young generation will not get the knowledge of history and artefacts so the identity of culture will get obsolete. Overall, the identity of the culture and history of any nations will be obsoleted in the future that is the reason why the museum should not charge for entry in museums for pupils.
It is increasingly likely that charging entry fee in the museum has several benefits. However, there has been required to increase provisions for visitors. Ultimately, there are lots of prons of entry fee and which leads to positive aspects for museums in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95681063123 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57700255199 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471760797342 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3288386259 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7647058824 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420759202491 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15171815886 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125189357612 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281493880295 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12186499425 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.