Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Numerous museums from around the world are free of cost while others collect some entrance fees. Even though the museums would benefit from ticketing, I believe that they should be non-profit.
It is clear that charging the visitors for admission could bring the museums some regular incomes. Firstly, the amounts of ticketing could be used to maintain the museum operations by paying the bills of required services such as water, electric and cleaning service. Moreover, customer's payment could help the museums improve their quality in some aspects. The money could be used to upgrade the facilities by expanding the capacity of the museums or buying new exhibits. Another option is to raise the paid to employees. A better wage could have a positive influence on employees attitude, which also has an important impact on the quality of service.
However, is it really necessary to take money from the visitors to supply the museums? There are a variety of other solutions to raise fund for the museums. For instance, the museums can open courses about art or history, and organize some charity exhibits to gain financial support from the private sector. In addition, the access cost could discourage not only the tourists but also the local people from visiting such historical places. The ticket price could be unaffordable for paupers, prevents them from approaching and experiencing an educational environment of the exhibition halls.
In conclusion, although the fee of admission allows the museums to grow better in some ways, I still think that the gate to historical places should be open freely for everyone as the educational benefits are more essential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...wage could have a positive influence on employees attitude, which also has an important i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant impact on the quality of service. However, is it really necessary to take ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, really, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20664206642 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62368629922 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3609082855 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256331951306 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875389480537 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781971121774 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151138091262 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00964896888402 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.