Both technological or cultural museums are undoubtedly playing vital roles for people to learn or appreciate various knowledge and cultures, which benefit on human beings’ mental improvements. Some well-know museums such as The Great British museum, has become the symbol of intelligence of mankind. Nowadays, it is argued that whether the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages or not. In my opinion, charging for admission is a better way for museums to manage itself.
It must be admitted that free for admission to museums can attract more tourists coming in the museums, which definitely contribute the spread of art or culture. Without the entrance free, travelers tend to add the museums to their list of attractions and simultaneously, grain more clear pictures about the nation or country. Also, free charging policy enables tourism becoming more prosperous. Although, the museums do not charge for admission, the relevant craft goods can gain more profits due to the large quantity of tourists.
Nevertheless, free for admission to museums might lead to more serious problems in the museums itself. Museums lose the main income if they do not charge people for admission. Under this situation, museums inevitably decrease their services, which need enough money to maintain. As a result, they lose the attractions.
By contrast, with the charging for admission, museums can improve the services and facilities, earning more cultural impacts.
In addition, charging for admission also benefits countries. Because of the profits in charging, there are extra funds for the government to educate native residents to learn knowledge to protect their cultures and customs from vanishing caused by globalization. Moreover, it contributes to protect the endanger visible or invisible heritages.
In summary, free for admission to museums has produced many benefits for the museums and tourists, however, as far as I am concerned, the positive influences in both museums and countries also should be taken into consideration when talking about this argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 300, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on. Moreover, it contributes to protect the endanger visible or invisible heritages. In s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in summary, such as, talking about, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5524691358 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92655583937 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9868557661 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.823529412 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526568534813 0.244688304435 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187887912787 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140065880038 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281445938522 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1026109299 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.