Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Nowadays, entering some museums should be paid a fee while others do not require any price. Although paying any charge has an advantage, this situation has also some disadvantages. In this essay will examine the pros and cons of this problem and try to draw some conclusion.
One of the main problems is pollution in a museum. In other words, when free entrance does not bring income for employees, the museum cannot afford to hire them. For example, every paint, frame or object can be dust and pollute unless employees clean them every day. Another drawback is security problems may occur. That is to say that, every museum have to own security employees or cameras for avoiding any stealing issues. These cameras need to be made maintenance, which means that all of the requirement can be provided by entering fee. As a result, because of this problem, many tourists can not prefer to visit this type of museums.
Turning to the other side of the argument, when the museums are free, the number of visitors increases much more than others. Therefore, many tourists can learn about the country's culture and history and share their knowledge with other people. This situation can enhance tourism activities because word of mouth method can provide to attract new tourist who wants to visit the country where their friends have been before. Entering free charge can bring some positive for the country's economy.
To sum up, even though many museums do not require payment is good to provide tourism attractions, pollution and security problems can be considered. Personally, I believe this situation causes disadvantages to outweigh advantages.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...o be made maintenance, which means that all of the requirement can be provided by entering...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, as a result, in other words, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23722627737 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09505620339 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616788321168 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6352354634 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21489320478 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723346557306 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582857112081 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127159321092 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018323797032 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.