In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past

Essay topics:

In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children. Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past.

People were used to of having a large size of family as this trend was common those days. Moreover, lack of education regarding family planning and bearable expenses would be a reason of family with higher number of members. In my perspective, it had many benefits as compared to drawbacks which would be discussed before making any statement.

First and foremost thing, that need to be addressed is moral values and affection towards family members. It can be seen that, children with join family learn more basic values such as giving respect to elders, taking care of their near and dear ones, honesty and responsibility. Whereas, these qualities are unexpected from people who avoid to be with large family. Furthermore, the another main advantage to be in large family is that, people do not need to panic in any though situation like unfortunate accidents of one of the family members. The burden of financial cries can be divided between people of family. Large numbers people in any home would definitely provide a great support and strength. This kind of atmosphere can easily tackle major hurdles of life.
On the other hand, people who prefer to live in small family claim that, privacy is the most crucial part when some one present at their own house. In nuclear family this thing is quite hard to find. Another thing, the more people live together the more chances of grudges and inconvenience in family.
However, these small problems can be sorted out when people have care and love for their family.
Hammering the last nail, it can be said that "To each his own". It is clearly visible that, being with large family is more beneficial than staying separated. Nowadays loneliness is extremely toxic to human soul therefore having someone in family to share any problem with is a blessing.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-05 Vũ Phương Linh 78 view
2022-04-04 Vũ Phương Linh 56 view
2021-08-10 tranthimylinh93 56 view
2021-08-10 tranthimylinh93 56 view
2021-04-21 manjeetsingh 78 view
Essays by user manjeetsingh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... dear ones, honesty and responsibility. Whereas, these qualities are unexpected from pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid being'.
Suggestion: avoid being
...ualities are unexpected from people who avoid to be with large family. Furthermore, the ano...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge family is that, people do not need to panic in any though situation like unfo...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is that, people do not need to panic in any though situation like unfortunate ac...
^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bers people in any home would definitely provide a great support and strength. Th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, another thing, kind of, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94136807818 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46081234694 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6973049102 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2352941176 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29807783837 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916891743343 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532042517972 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152490356451 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602861108326 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.