Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that these days, many people argue that students in high schools should make comments or even criticism of their teachers, on the other hand, a considerable group of people thinks it will become a harmful habit for youngsters to lack respect and self-control in class. This phenomenon has ever been a controversial proposition for all parents who concerned about their child’s behavior and the quality of the educational system. From my individual perspective, I would argue that encouraging children to make comments directly to their teachers could bring some disadvantageous consequences, in contrast, there are much more techniques to improve their experience of schooling.
In one’s sense, students’ comments could be useful to teachers whose teaching methods are not professional in order to correct their faults efficiently. For instance, the class’s representative should be given permission to report the current teaching situation in class, even those students who make critical comments to them. To be clear, no matter how long their career is, each teacher always consists of some specific false that only students - the “experiencer” could see and tell exactly what it is. But this has never been a priority idea to increase teachers’ quality due to some kind of students that behave badly to the one who teaches them, which indirectly affect those lessons.
However, I state that this method will never make such an impact on one school’s quality, there are many more methods instead of this sensitive one. I decided to allow that kind of students are free to make a criticism to their teachers specifically and elder people generally, it will become a toxic generation put in this context. Students, yet still should observe the teacher to a certain degree that their instruction could help improve their skills, in opposition to that given negative way. By the same token, a considerable method to fulfill schooling conditions is to fill the gap between students and teachers, simply as encourage them to become friends, this seems to be the advantageous one so far because of the interaction between them, students could be more knowledgeable and teachers will realize the trouble hanging on.
In conclusion, despite the fact that students would better give out their personal points about their curriculum, this still has many unexpected after effects. So that I would argue that this could lead to disrespect and conflicts in both teachers and children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teachers whose teaching methods are not professional in order to correct their f...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...comments to them. To be clear, no matter how long their career is, each teacher a...
^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uality due to some kind of students that behave badly to the one who teaches them...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, it is true, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89222412979 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0350982156 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.307692308 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7692307692 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350317963415 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12456295536 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741707381162 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214479205149 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907400793087 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.