Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism?
In contemporary society, the striking downside of international tourism has become a controversial issue in many parts of the world. While this negative attitude towards overseas travelers can be attributed to various reasons, there are lots of feasible approaches to this phenomenon.
To begin, people living in an overcrowded city with the hustle and bustle of visitors have to withstand air, water, and soil contamination. This is undeniable that the more developed in tourism each country is, the more waste is discarded. In fact, because of the lack of knowledge about global changes, many tourists throw rubbish on streets when there is no need for, regardless of public rules and regulations. This can entail some serious environmental problems because it takes a thousand years for plastic items to be disintegrated. Secondly, some wilful tourists’ misleading comments can take a heavy toll on traditional customs. For instance, many people consider ao dai as antiquated clothes.
Turning to some possible measures could be handled to resolve these problems, first of all, governments should stipulate some laws related to letter and waste to boost the responsibility for clean public places spotlessly. This could result in not only the developed and hospitable host countries, but also friendly-environmental ones. Second of all, governments could fund educational training for tour guides to help them enhance the level of knowledge and expertise. This may lead to the route to fulfillment of the tourist industry without conflicts with holidaymakers due to the widespread criticism. All of these solutions can change local people’s negative impression on travelers.
In conclusion, negative attitudes can stem from population and short-sighted thoughts of visitors, whereas rules and high-quality education can reduce these problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | kenguoita | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | Nhu Tuyet | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21791660005 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667857142857 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6476099533 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307873885856 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913134112224 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555892590895 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17149723761 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748878732983 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.