Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
Many people argued that international tourism has detrimental effects on their nation. Some explanations will be put forward before some possible solutions are drawn.
There are two significant reasons why the locals think that tourists from overseas bring about disastrous influences. First of all, traditional customs and indigenous practices of the host country will be diminished by tourist’s insensitivity. Some Western holidaymakers, for example, wear unsuitable clothing and behave provocatively. This may make youngsters of the host nations imitating. As a consequence, the core values of traditional customs and indigenous practices will be not entirely. Another reason is that tourists from other countries also make an adverse impact on host nation’s environment. They litter waste on beaches or other destination places and make it become more and more unattractive.
However, some measures could be implemented to address these negative attitudes of the local residents. One of the most significant solutions is that raising awareness for them about the unquestionable benefits from tourists. If there are no benefits from these groups, GDP of the host nations will be decreased considerably. Hence, Tourist agencies have to convey these positive impacts through news media in order to make this solution become reality. Another action is that urging visitors to respect the environment of beauty spots where they visit. This may be ensured by enforcing strict regulations on anyone throw waste away at not right places.
To conclude, only by tackling the problem from the local’s attitude, this situation may be flawed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'throws'.
Suggestion: throws
... enforcing strict regulations on anyone throw waste away at not right places. To c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70161290323 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07784664309 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653225806452 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.2170078498 49.4020404114 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978250881404 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351469985782 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064409214779 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706103040138 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731843949532 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.