Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
Some people think foreign tourism has negative effects on their nation. In this essay, I will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why travellers are criticised for damaging the environment. First of all, travellers have a lack of awareness about protecting the environment, such as by throwing a wide range of trash and plastic nylon around their surroundings. As a result, it pollutes the environment and increases garbage everywhere. Not only that, it also causes air pollution because the more tourists use vehicles, the more smoke it eliminates into the atmosphere. Last but not least, tourists bring infected diseases, such as viruses and pandemics, when travelling around the country. It has harmful influences on both local residents and travelers. For instance, a large number of people were killed by tourists in an infectious Corona pandemic in 2019.
On the other hand, there are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, the government should have policies to limit the amount of garbage coming from foreigners. For example, they should implement campaigns such as hanging banners to educate individuals about the importance of defending the environment. Moreover, tourists should raise awareness about travelling to the host country and get rid of trash as much as possible. Additionally, the authorities should invest in modern equipment to check travellers at the airport.
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation. From my point of view, it has much more profit for both the native folks and the regime of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... residents and travelers. For instance, a large number of people were killed by tourists in an in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16724738676 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85019977328 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9580113324 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132044029155 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040045583267 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529215898648 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853472824927 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687913487322 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.