Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
It is indisputable that international tourists can exert adverse effects on their host countries through their activities on land and at sea. This situation is comprehensible, and viable measures can certainly be taken to address these issues. In this essay, I will elucidate various reasons for this phenomenon and propose practical solutions to mitigate the associated problems.
One prominent factor contributing to this issue is pollution. As international tourists engage in various activities such as dining, traveling, entertainment, and recreational pursuits, they inevitably generate waste and emissions, which can lead to water and air pollution, thereby causing environmental degradation. Moreover, travelers may inadvertently introduce disease-causing viruses to their destination country. These viruses can adhere to individuals and spread to different locations, potentially leading to the emergence of epidemics under favorable conditions. A case in point is the recent COVID-19 pandemic caused by the coronavirus, originating in China and subsequently propagated by Chinese tourists.
There exist several feasible solutions to address this multifaceted problem. Firstly, to safeguard the environment, governments should raise awareness among tourists by strategically placing banners on street corners and within schools. This indirect education approach can help instill a sense of responsibility towards environmental protection, particularly in younger generations. Additionally, the installation of ample trash receptacles in various locations is essential to discourage littering and promote proper waste disposal. Secondly, governments could establish medical screening teams equipped with health screening devices at airport terminals to promptly assess the health status of incoming travelers.
In conclusion, while there are undeniable challenges related to the impact of international tourism, there are viable steps that can be taken to mitigate these issues. By adopting a comprehensive approach that combines education, infrastructure development, and health surveillance, the negative effects of foreign tourism can be curtailed, ensuring a more harmonious coexistence between visitors and host nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.37828947368 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39993322965 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664473684211 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6571604158 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105127588685 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314789102412 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417084415179 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660244279481 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498859688615 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.72 12.4159519038 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.74 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.