Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
These days, citizens are supposed to think that foreigners are an enormous threat to their nation. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
The main cause that needs to be mentioned is air pollution, which is caused by outdoor activities. International tourism uses a number of transportation methods for their trips, and as a result, they release a large amount of air waste into the environment. In addition, pollution rapidly increases because of garbage, which people don't get into. Moreover, the special reason is disease, which humans actually worry about. Because of a lack of stringent airport security, many serious diseases, such as SARS and H1N1, have been reported in Vietnam. COVID-19 is one of the serious diseases that cause crises all over the world. Only one person was affected for all humans, and a number of people were affected during Passover.
There are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, the government should provide methods against diseases, such as providing medical machinery at airport security doors to check international tourism’s health status. Secondly, be stricter in issuing tourist visas to filter out tourists who come for other purposes. Finally, foreigners should have a medical certificate before travelling to make sure there is no sign of any infectious disease.
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the bad things that international tourism brings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reases because of garbage, which people dont get into. Moreover, the special reason ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26377952756 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77438405676 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6981401206 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192108417122 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531988067329 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04453882322 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110332216363 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294582591011 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.