Many people believe that modern technology has brought people together but others believe that technology has driven people apart Discuss both these viewpoints and give your own opinion

Nowadays, Technology is rapidly increasing all over the world because it decreasing the burden of inhabitants. Some believe that technology with modren technique has united across the world while others say that it is the main reason to divide the people. In my opinion, I believe that modernised technology is the only reason to meet on online even the inhabitants are in other countries. However it also creates some disadvantages

On the one hand, The technified world can communicate with people without their physical appearence. It is the main reason in order to bring people on a single platform. Although inhabitants are from different countries and traditions, they use the internet and meet the new people from other other nations. Because interaction between different cultures and originated people, they become friends irrespective of their traditions. For instance, India and pakistan are the two famous countries but they are rivals since they originated. Even though the countries oppose each other, mojority of people on internet interact with each other and replicates the harmony so that new technology unites the world without any discriminations.

On the other hand, some believe, The relationships between the people in the society was rapidly decrease in the past decade Because of the modrenised technology. Majority of inhabitants are addicted to internet so that they not communicating with people who are beside them. Inhabitants are completely will become artificial if they stuck with internet. In addition, It leads to many diseases such as eye sight and headache. The headache will affect the person If he use internet all the time. Hence, It is the main reason to break the relations between the people.

In conclusion, The new technified techniques are the effectivre reasons for the unifying the world on a platforn. In contrast, others say that this internet usage leads to break down the relations between the people because they who use internet don't communicate with peole much.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...the inhabitants are in other countries. However it also creates some disadvantages O...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...e internet and meet the new people from other other nations. Because interaction between di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd pakistan are the two famous countries but they are rivals since they originate...
^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...n the people in the society was rapidly decrease in the past decade Because of the modre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...tion, It leads to many diseases such as eye sight and headache. The headache will affect ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...e headache will affect the person If he use internet all the time. Hence, It is the...
^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he people because they who use internet dont communicate with peole much.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31152647975 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85794263485 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3422402458 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197634034457 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649630809829 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572630915513 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123057916242 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451940169929 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.