Nowadays, how to regulate and manage education system is so vital in every part of human’s life. Focusing on good attributes of this perception leads scholars to be in a highly effective way. Some people would argue that providing all parts of knowledge is essential. On the other hand, many people say it’s a trivial approach to consider all parts of academic lessons. Personally, I lean towards the second opinion.
University and also various types of educations have a huge impact as well as playing pivotal role in every single humankind’s life. having a sustainable approach leads nations to be in an impressive way. However, involving a full range of both theory and practical lessons is just deteriorating the principal part of time. In addition to this, one of the most fundamental criteria of academic system is concentrating on useful teaching methods in order to promote well-educated persons. For instance, geology and math are having an integral characteristic to stimulate science.
On the other hand, some people regard completely forms of lessons as a vital source. Going under the surface, full consensus has been available among this people in which including the whole categories of lessons gives rise students to don’t be in a destructive way. They tend to believe even theoretical subjects foster a sophisticated person. From my point of view, this approach is just putting a strain on students due to restrict human’s valuable time. Scrap lessons such as history is devoid of any useful divisions.
Overall, it can be seen that eluding from some traditional lessons are culminations of contribution between either citizens or people in authority throughout this issue. A successful policy would be made and a scenic prospect of destiny might be erected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
... role in every single humankind’s life. having a sustainable approach leads nations to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an impressive way" with adverb for "impressive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ustainable approach leads nations to be in an impressive way. However, involving a full range of bot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lessons gives rise students to don’t be in a destructive way. They tend to believe even theoretical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23611111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93512676656 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4942671512 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7058823529 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145966381553 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402201862482 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364719813059 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808650608508 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411261995133 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.