Many people believe that zoos are cruel others believe that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Many people believe that zoos are cruel, others believe that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

While zoos have been familiar destinations to several people on some occasions, many of them assume that zoos take a necessary role in saving endangered species. However, there is still a group that notices the cruelty of zoos.

With regard to the species which are on the verge of extinction or have lost their natural habitats due to deforestation or climate change, zoos are ideal places to survive. Firstly, zoos recreate the living environment most similar to their incident natural habitats and remain a stable ecological balance for the rare, therefore they can easily adapt to the new house. Secondly, zoos also support plenty of breeding programs for conservation and the survival of species. It’s interpreted as the endangered species that can receive all the best conditions to not only maintain but also resilience.

However, as a matter of fact, there are several commercial zoos are established nowadays of which priority is the attention of the visitors. Therefore, they capture a wide range of species, especially the wild ones and isolate them from their herd. In the long term of caging, these animals will lose their instinct and hardly able to come back to their natural habitats. Moreover, to create the highlight attracting visitors, various zoos force the animals to do circus by the rigorous training or even mistreatment. From my perspective, that actions seriously violate animal rights. In order to protect entirely the rare animals, it is better to take them to specialized animal conservation centers and the government needs to take responsibility in completely banning the poachers and destruction of the natural habitats.

In conclusion, there are several zoos that have noticeable conservation efforts for rare animals, nevertheless, their ruthlessness to serve the commercial purpose is considerable.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3875432526 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91956644876 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2118107752 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189546244565 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623861173367 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471510078826 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118754617315 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00990650957934 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.