Humans and animals have maintained a healthy relationship since the evolution of mankind. Primitives used to keep dogs hunt food and to secure their homes. Nowadays, the people who keep pets have a close bonding with them. They treat animals such as dogs, cats in the same way as their children. In my opinion, this relationship is good.
First of all, by keeping animals like birds, cats, dogs or cows increases their age. As if these animals stray on streets they are more susceptible to be pounced upon by predators. For instance, cats can be jumped upon by dogs or parrots could be hunted by ferocious birds like eagles or vultures.
Secondly, herbivores like goats, cows provides daily requirement of human beings such as milk and other dairy related products. In turn, humans take care of these domesticated animals species and provide them optimum nutrients and fodder to keep them healthy. Thus maintaining a mutual relationship.
On the other hand, this relationship is not viable because it takes away the freedom from pets to roam freely. In their natural habitat they can play with other animals of their kind. Often, it heard that people tie dogs for hours and sometimes punish them for fun. Recently, a footage has featured on news channel where a man is seen throwing a small puppy from top of the building. This kind of acts makes one think whether it is reasonable to keep animals at residence.
Considering above points one could say that these mutual relationships are good for both humans and animals. But some degree of freedom should also be allowed to domesticated pets as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cats, dogs or cows increases their age. As if these animals stray on streets they ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'such as', 'first of all', 'in my opinion', 'in the same way', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269736842105 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0756578947368 0.0946595960268 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0361842105263 0.0501214627716 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0526315789474 0.0437548338989 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144736842105 0.122226691241 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0460526315789 0.0403226058552 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55355759457 2.80594681477 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0230263157895 0.0326793684256 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0690789473684 0.0861772015684 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164473684211 0.021408717616 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00657894736842 0.011925033212 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1612.0 1933.35771543 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 316.048096192 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90476190476 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315018315018 0.374742101984 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234432234432 0.28420135186 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135531135531 0.203846283523 66% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10989010989 0.137316102897 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55355759457 2.80594681477 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.037074148 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.56093040696 110% => OK
Word variations: 68.3792785513 60.7387585426 113% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1666666667 20.7743622355 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.010444246 49.517814964 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 127.492653851 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 20.7743622355 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.814263465372 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 38.6098901099 49.1944974215 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.86666666667 1.69124875643 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332228988449 0.332605444948 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0506757295645 0.102741220458 49% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0477516804638 0.0668466124924 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.471223717193 0.534860350844 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131611245069 0.148594505496 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105521868664 0.134430193775 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578178857343 0.0742795772207 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.119137652455 0.324371583561 37% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0246444665858 0.0638462369009 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179264713341 0.228012699653 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564512336972 0.058150111329 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.