Nowadays, numerous people in all over the world keep pet such as dogs and cats as companions in their home. There are several considerable debates about beneficial and detrimental impacts of this phenomenon between social researchers in different societies.
Some animal lovers believe that being with pet creates positive mental consequences in their life. They have some prominent reasons for this arguments undoubtedly. As they`ve mentioned singleness is a fundamental issue in contemporary century and pet can decrease this problem`s effects in people`s life. Recent published reports in U.K. illustrated that more than two third of families in this country keep dog as an appropriate pet in their home. Majority of people in this country insist that dogs are loyal and profitable animals totally. Because of these reasons they think that children should learn suitable behavior with animals from their childhood.
On the other hand, some social experts claim that keeping pet in home increase families costs. Furthermore, these type of animals are very sensitive and families should be circumspect about their behavior with them. Actually, lack of sufficient attention to pet causes some perilous results for families and animals simultaneously. To avoiding some unforeseen problems for pet many organizations has been established in recent decades in different countries and they are responsible of supporting these animals. According to last investigations in Middle East countries the number of keeping unaccustomed animals like tigers has been increased sharply in these countries. It is very unsuitable decision and lead to unavoidable problems for animals in these countries.
In conclusion, by glimpse to both sides of argument it is obvious that this event should be under control without any hesitation. I think that governments should devise a supportive plan to distribute suitable attitude about pet keeping in different societies. In my point of view, good behavior with animals is one of the most important challenging indicators for development in all over the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e. They have some prominent reasons for this arguments undoubtedly. As they've ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e loyal and profitable animals totally. Because of these reasons they think that childr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, so, third, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5875 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01907995091 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5556580302 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232111017735 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792135475877 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488981901766 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139008881751 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334443755361 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.