Nowadays, in this developed and modern world, family`s strength and circumstance of their domestic communications are the most prominent challenges for social experts. To distribute these relationships, having a daily meal together is an appropriate tradition which is disappearing during these years.
Most social experts believe that this disappearing has several considerable reasons and consequently, some effects definitely. According to recent published report in U.S. two third of people can`t have a daily meal with their family. These social experts argue that the first reason of this phenomenon is people`s business. They emphasize that the lack of sufficient time cause to disappearing this tradition absolutely. Furthermore, these experts think that, nowadays, by expanding technologies, majority of people are reluctant to increase their face to face communication. Because of that, even families relationship have been declined sharply.
In other aspect, social experts believe that decreasing old traditions, such as having a daily family meal with all members, would certainly have effects. They emphasize that in families daily meal, members can share their successes and problems during face to face talking. As a result, by eliminating this tradition, they can`t consult about their issues together and they should solve their problems alone and it can be perilous for family members. Additionally, these experts claim that increasing distance among family members would probably increase the number of crimes in societies. These experts insist that parents quota in decreasing children`s crime is undeniable and save old traditions on families can avoid children`s mistakes.
In conclusion, families distributed relationships cause to improve society`s situation undoubtedly. I believe that to save traditions as a significant vigor on families, governments and people should improve their communication attitude and by devise some suitable and applicable plans they can revive these traditions for future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...ce communication. Because of that, even families relationship have been declined sharply...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...amilies distributed relationships cause to improve society's situation undoubtedly. I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, third, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01016949153 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19900156788 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1742545841 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127618041491 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499475776675 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241343617306 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891522176809 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125588756065 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.