Nowadays an ordinary person can become popular through the internet and TV media. is it positive or a negative development? give your opinion and relevant examples
Nowadays, in this modern and developed world, technological improvements have been facilitated people`s life undoubtedly. One of the most prominent applications of internet and social media is sharing information and life tendencies between people which caused to increasing fame and popularity among ordinary people.
Some technological experts believe that this type of using technology is very beneficial for people to distributing their ideas and products easily. They insist that during recent years, by expanding social media, many businesses and trades have been established and it can be effective on people`s economic improvements. Furthermore, by using this application of internet, TV and other media some artists can share their arts which they could not exhibit because of financial issues. Additionally, these experts emphasize that by this method, people can share their innovative and creative ideas to improve society`s situation and it can help them to be more popular.
On the other hand, some social scientists argue that during these years, majority of people spend abundant time in internet and social media to share their photos, information, ideas and some other activities. In their idea, this situation is not appropriate and applicable for developed societies to increase their efficiency and caused to creating some unforeseen issues for people. Recent published reports in U.S. illustrated that for more than 70% of people in this country having more than 1000 followers in social media is very valuable. Comprehensive researches revealed that the way of increasing followers is not important for people absolutely. Social researchers claim that internet and social media have been established for some considerable reasons and recent attitudes about them are very different. Additionally, in their opinion, these pay attention to social media as a device to increasing fame can be perilous and detrimental for family foundation.
In conclusion, distribution of utilizing internet and social media as fundamental requirements for people is undeniable during these decades. I believe that people should have some merits and capabilities to be victorious and famous. In my opinion, popularity because of their type of using internet and social media without any significant result for society can`t be beneficial for people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-02 | mostafa jahangiri | 73 | view |
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- since traveling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists is it a positive or negative trend give your opinion and include relevant examples 87
- some people think that family has the most important influence on children s development while others believe that factors such as TV friends music and books have a more significant impact discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity. 67
- In some countries it is illegal for employers to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can't be beneficial for people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72033898305 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06494571574 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2599111404 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12802376115 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547531797581 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417874420655 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986336691535 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154385701276 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.