In modern scenario, unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. Nowadays innumerable individuals prefer to enjoy watching foreign movies rather than domestic films. According to my perspective, enumerable reasons can be considered for this notion like picture quality and authentic stories. Governments should make all possible endeavours to ensure accessible economic support to local film industries in order to motivate the citizens towards local movies.
Commencing the discussion, nowadays, people demonstrate tremendous enthusiasm and incomparable passion towards watching foreign movies rather than domestic numbers. Various reasons can be considered for this notion. Firstly, movies made in western countries display extraordinary and unpredictable visuals as well as highly appreciated sound effects. Moreover, people prefer to witness thrilling and adventurous movies that are apparently not shown in local family drama movies. For instance, in India, masses demonstrate incredible passion for Hollywood movies due to thrilling action and adventure. Moreover, with the advancement of science and technology, inhabitants get easily fascinated by the actions performed with the assistance of special effects.
Further elucidating my point, governments should invest gigantic amount of money in order to motivate the public towards the domestic films. They should make all necessary efforts to improve the quality of local movies. Moreover, administration should construct more authentic talkies and ensure reasonable as well as affordable ticket prices to inspire the natives to view the local movies. Apart from this, censor board should scrutinize the audio visual quality as well as the theme of the domestic movies to examine whether they meet the viewers expectations.
To recapitulate, globalisation has tremendously modernized the young generation. People prefer to view overseas thrilling movies rather than domestic family drama movies. Also, adequate amounts should be incurred by the administration to arouse the durable interest in people towards the locally produced movies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...h the assistance of special effects. Further elucidating my point, governments shoul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, moreover, so, then, thus, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17056856187 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99856231141 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.457953071 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.529411765 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269669800448 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784679581849 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737913402785 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170140729436 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692607370925 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.21 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.