Many people think that women should have given the same roles to male in military and police forces. Many people think that women are not suitable for this job. Discuss both views and give opinions.
Many people think that women should have given the same roles to male in military and police forces. Many people think that women are not suitable for this job. Discuss both views and give opinions.
It is commonly believed that female individuals should not take the positions of policemen and male soldiers as women may not be compatible with the professions. This essay will discuss both drawbacks and merits of the idea and explain why women can perform equally as men in police and military work.
On the one hand, it is well-known that police and the army are physically demanding and dangerous professions for women. In order to enter the occupations, candidates have to overcome intense training and endure harsh conditions. Meanwhile, women, who would be lack of physique in terms of stamina, endurance, and flex are less likely to meet the requirements. In addition, men appear to be decisive in important events, which enables them to react quickly in endangered circumstances. However, women, in general, tend to be indecisive and emotional, would find it difficult to pull the trigger, or arrest criminals in these situations.
On the other hand, there are some valuable qualities that only women can possess, are needed for the success of the police and military jobs. First, policewomen and female soldiers tend to be persuasive and sympathetic. This gives them a distinct advantage over their male counterparts in missions related to negotiation. Secondly, women get a good reputation for nurture instinct, which makes them more appropriate for being care-takers such as nurses, or doctors in military units. These types of positions not only suit their capabilities but reduce the risks while they are on the battlefield. Finally, even though the majority of women are not suitable for life-threatening tasks, there are some few standout females who are capable of doing these types of work. To illustrate, in Viet Nam, there is a special force established to deal with terrorism, which contains only female individuals.
In sum, I believe that women should be given more opportunities to join the police and army forces. Women are better at negotiating and nurturing, while some excellent policewomen and soldiers can work as well as their male colleagues, even though they are generally lack of physical strength.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... idea and explain why women can perform equally as men in police and military work. On ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in general, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8401673346 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5434005547 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.736842105 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416415268533 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135839894015 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17883190475 0.0667982634062 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290060135817 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.301561170763 0.056905535591 530% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.