In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose art subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physic). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed?
It is said that in both post-primary schools and colleges, female students prefer studying social courses, meanwhile, science subjects are male students’ choice. This essay explores several causative agents of this phenomenon as well as supports that students should have their own decisions in choosing their educational programs.
Gender is considered at first as the reason why this trend happens. Because of owning more sensitive and vulnerable characteristics than boys, girls are frequently keen on doing activities which are relevant to creativity and beauty. By the way of illustration, due to the surveys of the experts in Oxford University in 2010, it was noticeable that 95% of interviewed females voted for art, craft and music activities whereas it accounted for 90% of male students decided on sports and humorous experiments which would be held in their summer vacation.
Secondly, there is no doubt that the traditional stances result in this tendency. Women are suggested that counting on man, giving birth, doing household chores or light pieces of work, which apparently suit for their ability. Additionally, were men to expect to become a talented and well-doing host, they should take care all of heavy works and overcome every challenge occurring in their life. This belief lead to the difference in choosing subjects between two genders since male students should study science programs instead of artworks.
However, in the modern life, this point of view turns not to be sensible and possible. Students have their own right to desire what they want to study, which could not be influenced because of gender. Moreover, despite different physical characteristics, every educational program, such as official drawing class, possibly completely suits for both boys and girls, and somehow, male do better than female.
In conclusion, the traditional social stereotypes of choosing subjects is no longer relevant nowadays. Students would achieve success only if they could make their own option instead of conforming to others’ view
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84082266914 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4619510638 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178696516229 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609186268541 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363913853963 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975348526129 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263099243857 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.