In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed?
There has been a difference in subject preference in which the boys prefer to study science and the girls tend to enroll in arts classes. This will be explained below and in my standpoint, such change shall be encouraged to avoid gender imbalance
The aforementioned phenomenon stems from a long-standing gender stereotype that there are significant differences between men and women, in term of cognitive abilities. Over the centuries, it has been widely acknowledged that men are born with exceptional analytical capacity while women, in contrast, are inherently good at memorization. These public concepts have a considerable influence on the students’ decision on their subjects and future carreer paths. As a result, it is understandable that male students choose science subjects such as math and physics whilst female students head toward art subjects such as history and languages, because they believe that these subjects can develop their talents.
In my opinion, this trend is rather ridiculous and unscientific and changing it should be promoted. As a matter of fact, there is definitely boys who are interrested in literature as well as girls who are talented in engineering. Under the above-mentioned premise, students may be forced to give up what they truly excel at and blindly choose the subjects that they are opposed to. Students, regardless of gender, have the freedom to opt for majors that best cultivate their aptitudes. Hence, there is a necessity to eradicate such sexual preference on subjects. By doing this, youngsters will be able to make a wise and prudent decision on their future career, based on their competence and excellenece.
In conclusion, it is understandable why there is a difference in choosing subjects among genders and the society, including the public media and families should take action against this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...atter of fact, there is definitely boys who are interrested in literature as well as gi...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d on their competence and excellenece. In conclusion, it is understandable why ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3537414966 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06863049712 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4066270855 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23428207076 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745247897937 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574040504529 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143519608 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260173134916 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.