Many scientists and linguists predict that all people will choose to speak the same global language in the future.
How far do you agree or disagree with this prediction?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The issue of the cultural as well as national multiplicity has always aroused sharp debates among concerned people. Proceeding from this, a lot of researchers who work in the linguistic field believe that the mankind will decide to speak one international language in the future. Although I believe that exploiting a uniform lingual system carries a bunch of benefits, local and traditional speeches should be preserved.
On the one hand, modern world exists on the cutting edge which leads the humanity to the globalization and gradual merger. In that regard, business people build international companies and open offices in the different countries, whereas progressive parents prefer their children to study abroad. Therefore, nowadays the usage of spotless English is the one of the markers of educated and well-mannered person. For instance, according to the global statistics the one fifth of the Earth population speaks English and this language recognized as state one in 75 countries. Hence, the current trend reflects that the importance of the language skills should not be denied on the grounds that the business and personal boundaries of the planet are gradually blurring.
On the other hand, I am convinced that the cultural diversity is the very thing that makes our world beautiful. People are ready to travel thousands of kilometers to see something surprising and splending which is different than their usual life. Consequently, humanity must protect this unique local civilizations due to the reason that without them the globe will loose a bunch of flavors and vibrant colors. For example, I am a Bashkir and today this nation numbers less than two million representatives worldwide which makes me sad as I realize that my English is a way better that my native language skills. Thus, if the human beings are willing to save the cultural and national multiplicity for future generations, they should not strive for unification.
To conclude, even though the application of the identical language system includes many positive aspects as a convenience, individuals ought to think long term and save cultural variety. This phenomenon makes our world charming and fascinating and bringing to a common standard destroys the beauty.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue of the cultural as well as nat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional speeches should be preserved. On the one hand, modern world exists on ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the planet are gradually blurring. On the other hand, I am convinced that t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...rising and splending which is different than their usual life. Consequently, humanit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...reason that without them the globe will loose a bunch of flavors and vibrant colors. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y should not strive for unification. To conclude, even though the application...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8979455908 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8735111205 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132101783716 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391996133319 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388708666669 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074192148888 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113052875208 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue of the cultural as well as nat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional speeches should be preserved. On the one hand, modern world exists on ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the planet are gradually blurring. On the other hand, I am convinced that t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...rising and splending which is different than their usual life. Consequently, humanit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...reason that without them the globe will loose a bunch of flavors and vibrant colors. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y should not strive for unification. To conclude, even though the application...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8979455908 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8735111205 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132101783716 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391996133319 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388708666669 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074192148888 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113052875208 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.