Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time

Essay topics:

Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university, to travel or gain work experience.

Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time?

People have different views about getting one-year gap before initiating college and do travelling or experiencing a job by students. Personally, I believe that it could be a good viewpoint in which student be able to have some travel and work experience before university.

Undoubtedly, going to university is of Permanent importance for every student. Therefore, it would be beneficial if they were able to go tripe. Travelling provides them with a deep insight into the new mindset, besides it would be a unique cultural and historical experience. Such as, throughout visiting new historical places students would learn valuable life lessons. Also, If they take travelling with their peers, it leads them to become able to be more responsible. Moreover, they will develop the ability of adaptation to new life environment which will have a positive impact on university life more importantly when they should move to new places to study.

Furthermore, I believe working before starting university at least a year before can have numerous positive effects on developing the abilities of students, Since before that in school they just study and mostly they just do their homework, so, most of them do not have an obvious vision about the meaning of working and what actually want to do in the future, consequently, working before university provides them with a clear vision about their interests and their ability to do make a decision on their major as a student. In addition, working provides them with a sense of identity and satisfaction and students who choose to work are more likely to find it beneficial after during and finishing university.
Working broadens the students' horizon for their future job prospects and they will build better job career opportunity.

While some people argue that this a year gap causes wasting their
time. Therefore, they should enter university after finishing school as they are fresh and should be joined to class. However, strongly I believe this a year gap can be beneficial and is not a waste of time.

Due to the reasons mentioned above, I would argue that the
students should be taken the opportunity to have one year gap time before starting University and do travelling and or working, since, they would get more preparation for a new stage of their life as a student.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views about gettin...
^^
Line 6, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...shing university. Working broadens the students horizon for their future job prospects ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...build better job career opportunity. While some people argue that this a year gap ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, at least, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07272727273 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77179977796 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.304862861 49.4020404114 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.2 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295703107713 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104053796571 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763072127186 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141999157254 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860181887045 0.056905535591 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.