Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Finding career path is a mission which the young need to choose from the university. However, there is an argument. It can be argued the student have right to focus on the main major while some people hold the opinion that school should supply diverse program including the lessons which are not appreciated by major. In my opinions, these two views have their own reason.
According to the belief that the teachers should respect each individual personality. Obviously, doing with passion is great, students are willing to invest not only time but also mental to gain the satisfactory result. In fact, it boosts the coherence between them and school too. So we can hope in the future there will be more and more specific intellectual.
On the other hand, the second point has already it's own logic. The managers who run university should set up various curriculum, that help the undergraduate whom are not mature enough to orient their ahead days. Clearly, there are more disadvantage if you do disinterested duty. By contrast, the in front of the path is still a frog and the learner may even discover the areas of research they have never considered before. Moreover, the job market now being more and more competitive demands the applicants must have different skills cover on plenty of fields. Especially, this increases the percentage of success through working time. Therefore, compulsory subjects are inevitable.
In conclusion, having looked at both sides of this issue, I slightly assent with the statement says let the teens do what they like, whereas there should be still some required lesson.
(267words)
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07835820896 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61661362305 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694029850746 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7474873737 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242350417584 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577188457016 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678490484135 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137215197966 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617015344037 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.