There is little doubt that many students find some academic modules in the school curriculum undesirable to study. However, I entirely disagree that they should not spend the time to learn these subjects, and I will discuss the reasons.
To begin with, it seems vital to incorporate various modules into school syllabus which are necessary to nurture students` talents since they do not always share the same giftedness in academic disciplines. Some may be inclined to learn further mathematical subjects, but others appear to express more interests in sports or foreign languages. For this reason, only a fully comprehensive school curriculum, which involves a wide range of disciplines, would appear to help all the students to find their interesting subjects in this regards, with sufficient time to effectively practice with their teachers.
Furthermore, a core curriculum has been originally designed by pedagogical experts to mainly consider students` educational necessities, not their interests. This means that educational policymakers have planned to impart a wealth of knowledge to the pupils, and also improve their fundamental skills by regular series of course books and subjects. If the students were responsible to freely choose modules based on their desires, they would run the risk of illiteracy and as well as inappropriate resourcefulness in such areas as communication, team working, and especially scientific subjects which can all have significant impacts on choosing their university majors, and career progress later in life.
Some may argue that obligatory learning academic subjects may take time up which can be efficiently spent on improving other favorite fields, leading to motivate them to nurture their natural abilities more than ever. Nevertheless, while given appropriate time to be spent on desirable subjects through a comprehensive syllabus, they should be also fully taught of all necessary skills, ranging from scientific materials to practical and social skills which could be used in university and the work environments.
To conclude, personally, I believe that it seems valuable to spend time on learning all the essential academic modules because they have been planned to enhance students` fundamental educational and social skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s to find their interesting subjects in this regards, with sufficient time to effect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fectively practice with their teachers. Furthermore, a core curriculum has been ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...er progress later in life. Some may argue that obligatory learning academic subje...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, of course, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67052023121 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10377174489 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586705202312 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6243644773 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.363636364 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231299227377 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843856120692 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437244466747 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125147499504 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474030910786 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.