In modern society, the governments assume responsibility to provide all people with healthcare services. However, the issue of payment has been still controversial, with some people claim that such measures should be free of charge. Personally, I agree entirely with this idea, and I will discuss the reasons in this essay.
To begin with, as an extremely effective taxation system has been adopted to levy, for example, income tax, sales tax, and inheritance tax on community dwellers, they expect the government to set up funds for wide-ranging healthcare. This means that no extra payments need to be paid for constructing health-related infrastructures, and tutorial programs to nurture well-trained doctors and nurses. Furthermore, if local authorities expended as much as possible of nation`s healthcare, not only would the general public benefit, but rather there would be overwhelmingly long-term benefits for the government. As the exorbitant costs of modern medicines may be prohibitive in less affluent families, without sufficiently subsidized health-related facilities, they might suffer significantly from devastating disorders, making an obvious obstacle against economic growth.
Of course, I do appreciate some opponents who argue that not only can the government afford all the expenses involved due to its limited natural resources, and thus financial constraints. They add that by focusing only on this topic, we may run the risk of neglecting an extensive variety of services such as transportation, education, and employment. Nevertheless, without a healthy population with an appropriate life expectancy, investment funds on such realms might be undisputedly unwise.
Given these arguments, it seems reasonable to conclude that an efficient taxation system provides policymakers with a reserve of funds to be allocated for subsidized healthcare which surely brings enormous benefits for both the state and inhabitants, particularly poor families, as long as other fundamental needs have been supported by the authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n's healthcare, not only would the general public benefit, but rather there would be over...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, for example, of course, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8178807947 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34749870126 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668874172185 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1181541261 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.727272727 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256871495289 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093286385031 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553993223189 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155056797856 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703179873723 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.