It is often a highly contentious issue that the tourism industry has made some adverse effects on tourist destination, regardless of its extremely economic booms. There could be some attendant risks posed to the local culture, and the environment, and could be canceled out with a few measures which I will discuss in this essay.
On the one hand, many people believe that international tourist may impose grave challenges on the tourist destinations. These range from cultural invasion to environmental issues. Firstly, the influx of foreign travelers from different cultural backgrounds is often associated with a gradual change in the local cuisine, garments, and traditions. While trying to attract more visitors, the indigenous individuals focus mainly on the international lifestyle to lessen the problem of the cultural shock to the travelers. This may result in local residents adopting new traits and behaviors to keep up with visitors, leading progressively to major changes in social standards and local traditions. Furthermore, increased tourists may raise the odds of environmental degradation, eventually causing health hazards for the residents. For instance, there might be growing demands for transportation which may induce traffic congestion, air, and noise pollution.
On the other hand, it is true that not only can the local authorities take measures to mitigate such detrimental impacts, and foreign travelers should assume responsibility for potential protecting ways. Have travelers encouraged to establish close relation with local cuisine, garments and participate in the local rituals, residents would have persuaded to present more cultural values. This may help to preserve traditional music, art, food, and costume. Moreover, while enjoying natural resources and landscapes, tourists should be aware of the ways to protect the environment. With using public transport in big cities, they simply contribute to improving such consequences as air and noise pollution.
Overall, international tourists are mainly criticized due to adverse effects on the local culture and environment. However, an effective response by travelers to respect cultural contexts, and protect the environment may lessen the severity of the situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76119402985 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06386465951 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3621212103 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207735954145 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633134574829 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548106632415 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132553499011 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434134165131 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.