It is often argued that the acquisition of an international language across different countries may progressively put national one on the verge of extinction. Personally, I disagree entirely with this idea, and I will discuss the reasons in this essay.
To begin with, there are several explanations why the prevalence of a universal language cannot replace the mother tongues. Firstly, local authorities have allocated a sufficient proportion of the national budget to enrich indigenous textbooks, and linguistic programs, hopefully contributing to preserving local dialect. This means that even a wealth of knowledge written in English as an international language has been translated into the local language to be educated in schools and universities. This may inevitably prevent their language from being died out. Secondly, the language in each country embodies many cultural heritage, for instance, poems, novels, and historic pieces of literature. To say that these rich heritages of tradition and knowledge can be easily neglected by using a universal language is rather a simplistic view. This is simply due to the vital role of these elements in rituals, and social events.
Of course, it is true that the universality of one language may promote mutual understanding of people from different geographical and cultural backgrounds. This is perhaps tremendously influential in enhancing cultural identity, economic boom, and international trade. Nevertheless, it is also a well-known fact that this process can perhaps develop the individual realization that gradual replacement of mother tongue with a global one may progressively translate into the incorporation of alien concepts and ideas. This may affect the fabric of society and social standards.
Given these arguments, it seems reasonable to conclude that the dominant presence of local language in academic course books, cultural contexts, and historic events might eventually guarantee the long-term usage of it among local inhabitants.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, of course, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6976744186 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15794318487 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2511473907 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102293343846 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394034983283 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417101769533 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649202246903 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305209030186 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.