It’s good to have English as a global language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience.
It is argued by many that English should be adapted as a global language worldwide. Whereas, many have contrary viewpoint and do not support this opinion. However, this change might bring many positive and negative outcomes, but I believe, its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages. Hence, promoting English language as a global language would be beneficial.
There are enormous benefits if English would be considered as a global language. Firstly, it would help to minimize the discrimination on the basis of language. Secondly, it would provide a platform to communicate with the people of another culture and language without any confusion. For example, while working abroad, many people find it difficult to mingle with local communities due to language barrier. Hence, such development would help them to interact with local residents more efficiently. Finally, domination of the English language is clearly visible on technology, thus, people who are deprived of using technology due to language issue would be able to use technology without any obstacle.
Nonetheless, if English becomes a global language, then it may bring many drawbacks along. The biggest threat is an extinction of local languages and negative impact on local culture and communities. For example, in India, most schools are English medium and teaching students all the subjects in English language. As a result, many children are not able to communicate in their native language and loosing respect towards their culture. Moreover, non-English speaking nations would be widely affected and might face serious consequences if such change occur. Furthermore, for many people it's tough to learn English language or become linguistic, hence, it would be another big challenge for them to acquire a new language.
To conclude, in my opinion, although by making English as an International language would be advantageous but at the same time, it might create unavoidable circumstances to deal with. Therefore, before implementing such changes it is essential to address the challenges and take necessary measures to make it convenient for general mass.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, then, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49696969697 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95717831408 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2752524397 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3888888889 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111184453355 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471020866532 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375319093883 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075250377349 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276257056416 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.