Nowadays, governments are seeking ways to improve public transport between cities. Although some people claim that the current transportation system should be developed, others, including me, believe that building new railways to launch express trains seems more beneficial for both the state and the consumers.
On the one hand, it is often argued that local authorities should set up investment funds to enhance the current mass transport, as many buses and aircraft are out of date, and this issue may impose the risk of devastating traffic accidents. Without new and modern means of transport, not only many citizens would waste their time and money due to traffic delays, but also they would be usually threatened by life-threatening road and aircraft injuries. Furthermore, with more sophisticated public vehicles and planes, the employment rate might be increased, as the local officials need further employees to offer more frequent services, and therefore, the travel industry might be developed.
On the other hand, those who support investments on the fast trains between cities point out that railways could perhaps provide travelers with more safety, especially when modern systems are being implemented such as express trains which offer convenient and excellent services and catering, compared to buses and airplanes. Moreover, by linking various regions, many tourist destinations, particularly remote areas, might be easily accessible, and this can provide local inhabitants with a substantial financial gain. Finally, the more connecting railways are constructed, more developed the deprived regions would become.
In conclusion, I feel that establishing more public funds on building infrastructures for express trains seems a wiser course since there are enormous benefits for the tourism industry and travel safety.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would usually be
...ey due to traffic delays, but also they would be usually threatened by life-threatening road and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71272727273 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88500025066 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647272727273 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9472870754 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.555555556 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193490505661 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783369937895 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588523627381 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123853580316 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724719731128 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.