The question of whether students should take extracurricular classes or attending sporty events after school hours has remained a matter of debate. There are strong arguments on both sides, which I will outline here.
On the one hand, those who support the further study time highlight that such extra classes might help students to learn more scientific disciplines, leading progressively to improve their academic achievements. This is a significant factor which clearly contributes to the career development later in life. Furthermore, they point out that teachers can take students` focus away from the potential distractions outside schools, like video games or even criminal behaviours. This means that teachers and schools can manage their pastime to be effectively taken up. Finally, by participating in extra classes held after school time, pupils would have a sufficient time to foster their practical skills. Indeed, not only course books can nurture students` talents in an ideologically sound manner, but rather in many instances, extracurricular courses can successfully master them into a specific profession.
On the other hand, many experts cite various benefits that playing can provide teenagers with. It is widely acknowledged that classes could be a source of anxiety, as students are condemned to do homework appropriately. For this reason, pupils are encouraged to attend sporty events based on their choice, instead of attending extra academic training, and this will ultimately help them to retain their mental comforts. Moreover, there are substantial physical benefits children can derive from playing at schools, with strenuous efforts to strengthen their muscle power and increase physical fitness.
Overall, I believe that although extracurricular programs seem to be necessary to obtain practical skills, as well as further theoretical developments, children need to have a flexible schedule to incorporate a fixed amount of time for playing freely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether students should take extracurricular cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71140939597 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04759329189 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657718120805 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5223476249 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152295732588 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049977698575 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468188116447 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095419376185 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208316089662 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.