The present graph depicts a simple comparison in terms of the amount which accounted for the production and consumption of electricity in ten countries in 2014.
As might be expected, China reached the highest figure regarding production and expenditure, at just over 5 billion kWh. The United States came next, generating and using much less than the former, at just 4.3 and 3.8 respectively. Having a huge difference, Russia possessed the third position, followed by Japan which represented a slightly lower rates. These were followed by India, Canada, France, Brazil, and Germany, ranging roughly from 500 to 870 kWh. In contrast, the lowest figures belonged to Korea. Rep with just lower than 500 kWh that showed approximately tenfold as much lower generation and consumption as China.
In addition, it seems quite sensible to emphasize that there is a minor difference between corresponding rates for production and expenditure, except for Germany with a reversed pattern.
All things considered, the most striking feature is the superiority of China and the U.S over other nations, as opposed to a tiny fraction of Korea. Rep.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...e is the superiority of China and the U.S over other nations, as opposed to a tin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, third, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27624309392 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89913672367 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674033149171 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.232244068 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.428571429 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17402083663 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787799113193 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11436548985 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123394126146 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131905249098 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.