We are always seeking effective ways to reduce driving crimes, and it is often said that the best method is to impose strict punishments. However, others including me believe that this would only one of a range of options we should use, not the most effective proposition.
One the one hand, those who support severe penalties promote the idea that traffic offenders should incur extra costs which could be prohibitive in most cases, especially when combined with imprisonments. This might be a significant factor which remarkably changes the codes of conduct and even life-threatening styles of driving such as dangerous driving at fast speed. Furthermore, they add that if careless drivers knew that they might be no longer eligible to have a driving license because of traffic crimes, they would certainly obey regulations, leading to a dramatic decrease in road accidents.
On the other hand, it is often argued that there is a number of more viable strategies rather than severe punishments. Firstly, having continuous education initiatives through mass media and schools seems to improve drivers` understanding of dire consequences people would suffer if they broke the laws. While they are well-educated regarding driving rules and restrictions, they should be fully aware of financial, social, and health burden of road accidents. This would appear to change drivers` attitude towards reckless driving, hopefully preventing from further damages. Secondly, unless the quality standards of roads and cars are at reasonable levels, road accidents can never be halted. This is undoubtedly beneficial to have modern cars with, for example, airbags and seat belt, and wide and safe roads in order to ensure drivers and pedestrians to have high levels of security.
In conclusion, I believe that imposing strict penalties seems to be severe and deterrent to some extent, but not quite the most effective way because educational programs and enhancing standards of cars and roads are undeniably fundamental needs to secure drivers and passersby.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43302180685 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90919366315 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616822429907 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3053798476 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20834550325 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721238212711 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311485705767 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126026587705 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182953392382 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.