The question of whether employers should consider a quota for the female in workplaces has been still a controversial issue, as some people try to outlaw gender discrimination. However, this issue is not entirely straightforward and arguments can also be made against the idea. I will Discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the quota for female as a legislation cite various benefits this action can bring to both organizations and women. Firstly, it can be said that this law would allow women to enter traditionally male professions, ranging from surgeons to airline pilots, and as well as political parties. This may expand the pool of people available to do this job, and thus increasing the selectivity and diversity of applications. Another important consideration might be that the role of women in social and business activities has been undermined. For this reason, such quotas have been legislated to improve female`s social and occupational status, meaning that they would act as a role model for younger women in society. To supporters of this idea, these benefits are convincing.
On the other hand, it can be true that gender quota fairly considers the women`s right to effectively embark on various career opportunities; Nevertheless, this law may be simply unenforceable in practical terms. This is because the number of women who wish to be a pilot or surgeon may be substantially lower than men. This being the case, it would appear to be impossible to enforce quota in all jobs. A second point might be that the reduction of inequality should start at early ages, with equality of qualifications, career and life choices, rather than being enforced retrospectively by employers or the state.
All things considered, it appears that the aim of this law is admirable, but they are unworkable in realistic terms due to differing wishes of existing workforces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether employers should consider a quota for t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10588482306 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593650793651 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9714305734 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217155760927 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815492339616 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303411905505 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127416057159 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333640417146 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.