There have been vociferous voices that claim schools are of paramount of importance to the successful development of the social and intellectual context of teenagers. From my perspective, to hold this point of view seems an example of rational thinking.
To begin with, there are several reasons why the biggest onus is on the schools and teachers. Firstly, it seems quite defensible that syllabus has been designed by expert pedagogical to improve both academic and ethic aspects of students. Having modern course books and continuous formal examination, sensible teachers can recognize talented pupils, subsequently employing effective methods to bring them out the best. Secondly, children can in some cases learn codes of conduct and ground rules from their teachers, hopefully leading to improve their moral standards. Equally, children also face peer pressure which can be either advantageous or adverse, arguably shaping their thinking and social values.
On the other hand, nobody can deny the parental influence on children which is of great benefit. Initially, parents can act as a role model to establish ground rules for behaviour, whereas there seem to be some frictions between parents and children. For instance, while children want to adopt the global culture, parents may force them to confine themselves to traditions. Consequently, some valuable social norms may be ignored which are tremendously beneficial, because children will not be able to tackle problems independently in the future. Furthermore, parents are not as much powerful and trained as teachers to bloom teenagers’ talents in a suitable way.
All things considered, while being in the family is undoubtedly essential for absorbing patterns for behaviour, there are more outstanding merits of schools when they handle children with great care.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... children can in some cases learn codes of conduct and ground rules from their tea...
^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable way" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...achers to bloom teenagers' talents in a suitable way. All things considered, while being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for instance, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55516014235 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87101505088 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658362989324 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6524175521 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163083579321 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540650418118 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432495886153 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945706927091 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224196261693 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.