The exotic, remote tourist destinations have surprisingly attracted a substantial number of tourists ever than before; however, visitors are assumed to have obvious benefits and a few drawbacks which merit rigorous scrutiny.
To begin with, the most visible advantage would be probably a great opportunity to communicate with local indigenous and tribes of interesting linguistic and cultural backgrounds. This means that travelers may find themselves immersed in the sheer exotic traditions of local dwellers, ranging from language to traditional attires and cuisines. They had never experienced such aspects through other tourist destinations, where they are mainly provided with ordinary foods and entertainments which might be inevitably unattractive. Furthermore, the second plus point might be that such a journey can give them a genuine sense of adventure to explore historical places and buildings, which only be searched through books and the internet. This is definitely invaluable because a wealth of information and even pieces of literature regarding political, historical, and religious past events could be exposed, persuading visitors to carry out further expeditions and curiousness to untangle unsolved questions about topical subjects.
Turning to other side of the argument, perhaps the most impractical characteristic of such journeys could be a number of health-related issues confronted with tourists. This may range from infectious diseases, such as Malaria in Africa, to some devastating menaces of predators in forestry regions like Amazon. This is a clear limitation because some of them seem to be incurable, resulting in dire consequences afflicting alien visitors. Correspondingly, a further handicap might be the exorbitant costs involved, which can clearly preclude further explorations to sample strange foods and experience rural hinterlands and remote tribes.
Overall, personally, I believe that the benefits in terms of obtaining a deep-knowledge of local culture and historical monuments outweigh any negative points such as potential health threatens and exorbitant costs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, regarding, second, so, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93137254902 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19182021157 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653594771242 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8678538367 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.0 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105306368887 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037656850108 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377979954025 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658688255234 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184391658982 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.