While a wealth of knowledge has been increasingly accessible via the internet, the role of academics in modern tutorial system continues to be controversial because some people claim that they only transmit information to the students. However, others, including me, believe that it is one of a range of duties teachers should perform. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluded view.
On the one hand, opponents of teachers in modern education highlight the fact that the internet has provided a valuable source of information on various fields beyond the teacher`s knowledge. While improving the student`s study skills such as independent research and synthesizing sources, rather than old-fashioned rote learning, these pleasant experiences seem to make their lesson less teacher-led. This is surely a significant factor which clearly contribute to improving their academic achievements. Furthermore, it is often said that the internet can be inevitably an invaluable resource for the distance learning and self-study modules, as there are some hinterlands and rural areas suffering from an inadequate supply of teachers. This could be tremendously influential because such deprived areas can be sufficiently connected to a network of learning system, eventually improving the educational level of people from different ages.
On the other hand, those who support the teacher-based education point out that it is the role of teachers and school managements generally to ensure the use of the internet remains a guided learning process. The pupils may find data-gathering from the social networks fairly overwhelming, as they are provided with a wide array of information, either useful or frivolous. Advocates also add that the accessibility to the networks does not necessarily mean that students can find all their answers autonomously. Having a generous help from an expert, well-trained teacher not only expand pupil`s knowledge but also enhance their logical and lateral thinking.
To conclude, I believe that the internet can supplement and add to the knowledge which the students are assimilating through teachers and course books. This is provided that teachers manage their access to useful information, and guide them in finding their answers, progressively lead to higher lateral thinking abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce their logical and lateral thinking. To conclude, I believe that the internet...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66005665722 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14909952804 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597733711048 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0356518044 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154913374506 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518046803866 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408737738922 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098056298487 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218461844249 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.