The role of television in the world today is widely debated, with some people claim that it is indeed a sophisticated channel to improve people`s lifestyle. Personally, I agree entirely with this due to some reasons, which I will discuss in this essay.
In the context of globalization and socialization, it is vital to establish modern routes of communication and interaction between people across different cultural backgrounds. For this reason, television has introduced various channels from different countries, hopefully breaking the boundaries. This may result in local people adopting remote viewing of other cultural index, languages, rituals, and pieces of art and music. Therefore, it will gradually change the world to be a small village with people gathering together with different ideas. This may also help to foster social norms and communication skills. Furthermore, through its ability to educate, an extensive variety of scientific, social, and as well as religious programs have been targeted to publicly broadcast to local inhabitants with different age groups. For instance, continuous broadcasting of scientific documentaries significantly helps families broaden their knowledge and conception of day to day life. To supporters of this idea, these benefits seem more convincing.
It is true that television has provided some grave challenges for families, with some claim that these may pose threats to the ethic and social believes. The proof of this can be some porn series which can afflict teenagers and youngsters. Nevertheless, these issues are weighed down by some advantageous points and pleasures which can affect other aspects of people`s lifestyle to be less isolated from their cultural index.
All things considered, while television can be a great challenge and threat for families, I believe the benefits in terms of communication, socialization, and education different materials outweigh any negatives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69624573379 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16129768811 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607508532423 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6856201317 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875965074777 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305169907862 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033824543075 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556365600434 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125293546944 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.