It is often argued that financial constraints have imposed strict limitations on scientific research, and some people opine that the responsibility lies with the government to set up funds. I personally agree entirely with this idea, which I will discuss the reasons in this essay.
It is known as a fact that scientific investigations have proposed to develop a pool of data available for policymakers, hopefully improving consistently the efficacy of current national programs. The final results, therefore, will not only enhance the quality of lifestyles but also appear to decline noticeably the burden of annual living cost on the local authorities. For instance, studying on the medicine will inevitably lead to promote the public awareness of health preservation methods, and thus a significant reduction in healthcare expenses.
At the same time, it is true that a limited amount of natural resources and gross income seem to impose financial constraints in experimental surveys, however, such explorations may be eventually profitable for the nations. Indeed, it might be the developments in the field of technology which can empower domestic production, either in terms of quality or quantity; consequently, boost the export market. Furthermore, a scientific breakthrough could not only boost each country in different realms, such as the economy, national power, and reputation but also it seems to bring long-term benefits to the human race. The proof of this could be the powerful support from the U.S government made landing possible on the moon, and opening the gate of space explorations.
All things considered, I believe that a financial support from the local state to conduct research seems to be a cost-effective policy for the government and people, due to its benefits in the areas of the economy and science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ould be the powerful support from the U.S government made landing possible on the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37370242215 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11048607481 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4432904537 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.3 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217104514719 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734211972987 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529390718237 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125972464401 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368605241641 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.