Money for postgraduate research is limited, therefore, some people think financial support from governments should be provided only for scientific research rather than less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Money is so charming that everybody tries his best to chase for it. When we need some funds to keep forward all kinds of research, it is always lack of enough financial supply. It is quite natural that some will argue that we had better give up some so-called useless disciplines while, in this essay, I would side for all the subjects share the money.
Most scientific research enjoy the majority of the financial support from the authorities which is considered to be the effective way to develop science and technology. But they are not the only aspects that our society actually need and there are many other disciplines that keep the whole world advancing. China is the typical instance that shows us the great development of the science and technology while the administration level is still very low. Sometimes a series of reasonable management means play a vital role in a nation's administration, especially in a developing country with a big population.
Although we have so many different aspects to invest, it is recommended that scientific research could be the first choice among them for the developing countries. Science and technology is regarded as the first labor ability in China; further, it is proved that our spending most fortune to keep scientific research forward in the last 3 decades is the pretty wise choice with the result of being wealthy and advanced.
In conclusion, although the scientific research is the most important way that our governments should invest to keep the science and technology developing, I still perceive that many other kind of research need to be support financially, such as manage and administration investigation. Every subject seems to be useful which keep the society good for citizens to live in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... big population. Although we have so many different aspects to invest, it is recommended th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I would side for all the subjects share the money.
I would side for all the subjects to share the money.
need to be support financially,
need to be supported financially,
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230283911672 0.247107548796 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.148264984227 0.15552993741 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.123028391167 0.0946569551029 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0567823343849 0.0501201869031 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0536277602524 0.0437536398559 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11356466877 0.122223957237 93% => OK
Participles: 0.018927444795 0.0403219363162 47% => More participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.8970477431 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0315457413249 0.0326786765898 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00315457413249 0.00163938923432 192% => Too many particles.
Determiners: 0.10094637224 0.0861751148067 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.01261829653 0.0214082191602 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157728706625 0.0119246538136 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1770.0 1933.38276553 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 316.052104208 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0409556314 6.10592293882 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20519365927 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33904109589 0.37474360046 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280821917808 0.284197041944 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198630136986 0.203843217982 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140410958904 0.137313986986 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8970477431 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.560935902166 100% => OK
Word variations: 58.6536477044 60.7401812628 97% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0911823647 68% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5454545455 20.7725350517 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4331708825 49.5273876611 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.2574257426 93.4120437189 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 10.600660066 15.2821509519 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.36303630363 0.594174754866 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.39078156313 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01102204409 20% => OK
Readability: 54.6276463263 49.1922392462 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.40243902439 1.69127372897 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177622433821 0.332604825255 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142718285409 0.102734651613 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.094655305139 0.0668474354756 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.629068271547 0.534917948617 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164753892254 0.148666948902 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958190972129 0.13441755203 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541997391419 0.0742828286743 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.418824037917 0.324241079732 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.121233071974 0.0640056729886 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141599411149 0.22793763319 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042236987111 0.0582452615562 73% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41883767535 29% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.88977955912 136% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.60220440882 38% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.00200400802 50% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.493987976 95% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 70.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9