Excessive time spent on going to shopping malls by young individuals has been widely a matter of debate, with some people raise concerns regarding the adverse effects on youngsters and society. Personally, I disagree entirely with this idea and I will discuss the reasons here.
To begin with, it can be said that visiting shopping centers can act as a leisure pursuit, even if people do not intend to purchase, and this activity can bring various benefits for them and their society. This means that shopping is potentially known as a powerful way for most cases to afford spiritual enrichment, hopefully leading to feel better with their friends or family and gain a greater sense of happiness, especially when combined with the positive effects on their interpersonal skills. Furthermore, it seems that the presence of young people, who have strong desire to buy their stuff, is helpful in providing the sellers with a vibrant area to improve their financial transactions and open new business activities like food chains. This is undeniably a significant factor which clearly helps to create further career opportunity, and thus the economic boom.
Some may argue that the excessive time spent on shopping centers may take up individuals` time which could be better used for their educational tasks and family relationships. It may cause adverse effects on their academic achievements and family disruptions. Nevertheless, it would appear to be a sensible proposition if they spent carelessly the whole of their time on streets which seems to be true in a tiny fraction of society.
In conclusion, I believe that spending time on shopping centers may provide people and their society with personal and economic benefits, as long as they carefully manage their time schedule for their study and work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
Excessive time spent on going to shopping malls by young individuals ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...and thus the economic boom. Some may argue that the excessive time spent on shoppi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.204778157 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84055017911 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1251900582 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293042792025 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110827852692 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741976352112 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190816914246 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485827100844 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.