People are always seeking necessary information regarding business, educational and scientific subjects as much as possible. However, some people claim that there should be some limitations imposed on free access to such data. There are strong arguments on both sides which I will discuss here.
On the one hand, those who disagree with the easy share of information highlight the fact that these items of information that have been achieved by nations should be considered as a source of power for the governments. This means that local authorities could improve the civil infrastructures in terms of business environment and tutorial system which clearly lead to the monopoly of the state`s power in the region. Moreover, they also point out the considerable amount of time, energy and fund that have been spent to achieve this valuable information. For this reason, they feel that financial policies and prices could be a sensible proposition for those who want to use the bank of data.
On the other hand, it is often argued that any advances in the market share, science and education should be shared with other nations to improve their standards of living, and thus reduce the potential educational and economic gaps between countries. This is perhaps a significant factor which surely helps to mitigate the global challenges such as immigration from undeveloped countries. Furthermore, those who support the rationale of this idea claim that shared information might provide scientists and policymakers with a much bigger bank of data. This could be a more powerful source to conduct further research, and therefore obtaining more significant results which help to untangle current issues.
Overall, I believe that the high accessibility of information in various fields like education, business and science seems to be a wiser course, as it eventually leads to conducting further research, narrowing potential international gaps, and more importantly, eliminating the effect of the states` monopoly of power.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42586750789 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9320778089 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3549367159 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223938265829 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751489037192 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526154330254 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135012384179 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455815383787 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.