Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines
These days, household things that used to be done by hands are now being done by machine is trusted. Besides, it must be reconsidered whether the development gives more advantages or even disadvantages if hand works replaced by machines. In this essay I completely agree that it gives more beneficial rather than disadvantages for several cases.
In the one hand, the main benefit of that problem is the technology can reduce our time on doing house chores and increasing the workers productivity. Furthermore, housewives that work at once can also downsized their household expense specifically they dont have to pay helper to do their house chores because they can do it on their own. In this case, utilizing machines such as vacuum cleaner robot to clean every corner of house and washing machine to laundry automatically are several examples to support that technology has downsized our time and expenditure. So it is also important to utilize technology without any worry as long as we do it wisely.
Differs with the benefits above, there are several drawbacks if we don’t utilize those technology carefully it will affect such as increase laziness, careless and dependency on machines. It is due to machines do one of our daily obligation, so when we have a long spare time the lesser homework to do. Refers to that case, the impact of using technology unwisely will make us lazy and careless because we may choose to have leisure time instead of take back the household chores. As the result we have to prevent over dependency on those machines. So there is no doubt to keep utilizing technology as long as we use it carefully.
In conclusion, from right here I stand that I don’t believed if utilizing technology such as using machines to make our life easier is unfavorable decision. In my opinion, it gives more beneficial as long as we are smart in taking its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...n doing house chores and increasing the workers productivity. Furthermore, housewives t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'downsize'
Suggestion: downsize
..., housewives that work at once can also downsized their household expense specifically th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eir household expense specifically they dont have to pay helper to do their house ch...
^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'those technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; those technologies
...eral drawbacks if we don't utilize those technology carefully it will affect such as increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tead of take back the household chores. As the result we have to prevent over depe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92834890966 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82883197635 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538940809969 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9991858375 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180688826722 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756438480664 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173571053672 0.0667982634062 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131608231542 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157908342853 0.056905535591 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.