Many university graduates are finding it difficult to get a job of their likeness. An outdated education system and limited exposure to hands-on experience are one of the many reasons behind this. This can be improved with the implementation of better-structured courses and relevant training exercises. This essay will discuss why it is difficult for students to get a job of their choosing and how an overhaul in the current academic settings and attending multiple internships will help the graduates.
Out of many reasons for university graduates not landing a suitable job, the main one is our education system not being up to date which is the first stepping stone towards finding a relevant job of our preference. We must constantly update ourselves with current industry standards and demands. This helps us to meet the expectation and match the required criteria to find a job which is viable for us. Next to it, the second reason is the scant practical experience students have about their profession. Throughout, our curriculum is designed in such a way that it imparts more theoretical knowledge than actual real-life experiences. For example, I remember my cousin who got turned down for a student counselling job as she never counselled a student or assisted someone during counselling in real life despite completing the counselling course.
To solve this problem, first and foremost, the government should revise the outdated curriculum to be more industry-ready. The course should include the latest trends in a particular profession which are required. Secondly, universities need to align themselves with the employers and work together to devise strategies to pass on practical experiences in the form of internships so that the students are industry-ready.
To conclude, many student graduates can not find suitable jobs because of out of date course structure and limited industry exposure. I think this can be solved with the joint effort of the government, the universities and the prospective companies by updating programmes and improving the hands-on experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36060606061 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11511761566 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8133407697 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21453085831 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777475273214 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635622936932 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134249501988 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290588520879 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.