Thanks to the enhancement of technology, people nowadays can contact their friends, colleagues, and families via the Internet. In many workplaces, employees are more likely to interact with others online instead of meeting face to face. In my opinion, I believe that the benefits of online communication could offset the downsides.
On the one hand, online interaction does wonder for the development of companies and the performance of workers. First and foremost, it is beneficial for all employees to discuss on social media, especially when they are not close to each other, or there is not an opportunity to face to face. Online communication also reduces the noise at the workplace so that other employees could not be interrupted and able to focus on their duties. Moreover, the innovation of media applications provides new tools that could help workers when they take part in the presentation. Those who are camera-shine find it easy to speak to others through their cameras.
On the other hand, online communication also has some drawbacks that give rise to the decreasing in performance. At first, when they are on social media, they tend to update their notifications and contribute to the distraction in their works. As a case in point, many workers or even students who are studying in online classes usually be caught up in surfing on the Internet. On top of that, talking through messages has a few difficulties to display the emotion and could result in misunderstanding to others.
In conclusion, although there are some downsides, I completely agree that people should have more online interaction because of its benefits as well as the evolution and performance of the industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...h other, or there is not an opportunity to face to face. Online communication also reduces the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ey take part in the presentation. Those who are camera-shine find it easy to speak to o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14388489209 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02220788326 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5629624637 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190870103277 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670403155144 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816970847295 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118292478294 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698490702372 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.