In last decade carrier change became more popular among the young generation. This essay will argue that the advantages of this outweigh drawbacks. The essay will demonstrate that choosing carrier in young stage of a life have a negative effect in economically productive life, followed by analysis how working experience overseas supporting this common trend.
The main reason why young population change their carrier is the necessity to choose their profession in early young stage of a life. Teenagers are encouraged to decide their future profession around before they had a chance to experience any job. In age around eighteen years, young people do not have enough informations and knowledge about the world around and in many cases their guardians making decisions on their behalf. The prime example is The Czech republic, where young students after graduating from high school in 15 years, have to choose their long-life carrier. Unable to decide, their parent make a decision for them.
Moreover, nowadays more than ever before, many countries offer Work and Holiday visa. Young and economically productive individuals have the opportunity to experience one or two years of living overseas. As its said, the apple from neighbour garden taste better, many of them deciding to stay in foreign country. However, it is not possible to everyone continue in their profession as each country has a different standards and demands. For instance, Australia offers Work and Holidays visa, but, national standards for migration are set very high and not everyone is suitable to continue in his carrier. For that reason many of arriving young professional have to change their carrier.
To sum up, following the old trends to decide a future carrier in early stage of a life is the main reason why young professional seeking change. In later stage or after experience of working overseas, young ones could make adequate and clear decision and find a suitable job.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21766561514 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63604640668 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3082448641 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307587283404 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104429860729 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820243740935 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171075903775 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05771285027 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.